Britney Spears Shows Off Her Post-Surgery Hairy Legs

bs_mirabelle.jpg
bs_mirabelle1.jpgbs_mirabelle2.jpgbs_mirabelle3.jpg
bs_mirabelle4.jpgbs_mirabelle5.jpgbs_mirabelle6.jpg

Britney Spears hit up Mirabelle on Tuesday night and showed off her recently liposuctioned legs. And naturally, there was an upskirt and a crotch shot, and you can even see the hairs on the back of her thighs. Gross!


Related Posts:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

43 Comments »

Comment by mon Subscribed to comments via email
2007-11-23 06:40:39

hmmm.. i really dont get to c the point of showin pics of britneys ‘hairy’ legs. i think ur goin too far, guys.. really. i dont think the obscenity of this pics is wearin that shirt or not shavin her thights (cmoooN!!!!) but takin these pics!!
and once again, why only postin these kind of pics of britney and none of other celebrities? (cause there are!) however, although id rather not see pictures like these, it shows they are normal ppl.
mon

 
Comment by shortirox
2007-11-23 07:52:08

She is not normal. She is photographed everyday. Her career depends on her image (yikes!) she should be more cognizent of how she looks and at least try for the love of god to be hygienic.

Comment by mon Subscribed to comments via email
2007-11-23 08:01:09

ur right, she is photographed everyday but who takes the pictures? maybe she should stay at home, but thats not a life! paparazzi shud give her a break (thats what i think).
about her looks, thats personal, u can like it or dislike it, but i think its a gud thing to not depend on that 24/7

Comment by shortirox
2007-11-23 11:52:44

Point is, she IS photographed everyday. This wasn’t an issue addressing the paps. Point is, they are there, she knows it, her image depends on it and she goes around looking nasty.

 
 
Comment by Glenn
2007-11-23 10:38:52

A razor, some shampoo and a bar of soap could do amazing things to this druggie. If only she knew it.

 
 
Comment by Laura
2007-11-23 08:11:51

Carolina is obssesed with Britney. And how come you don’t show the pics of Christina Aguilera baring her coochie.

Comment by shortirox
2007-11-23 11:54:50

That’s easy, because there is only one of those and it was an accident. See, a huge measure of someone’s intelligence is learning from mistakes. So, either A) Britney doesn’t care if her cooch is revealed or B) She really dumb and doesn’t learn from her mistakes. Yeah, I’m going with all the above.

 
Comment by fsajkfdldfh
2007-11-24 07:10:57

LMAO DON’T EVEN START, you Britney fantard.

That “coochie” was just your imagination. Christina was wearing a skin-toned panthyose. You couldn’t see ANYTHING.

Britney is retarded and nuts and does this flashing thing on purpose all the time. Christina is normal and sane.

Get a clue, you idiotic Britney fantards.

 
 
Comment by Pauly
2007-11-23 09:01:42

YOu just don’t show your ASS if you didn’t SHAVE! If She isn’t really looking for attention, she shouldn’t wear that kind of shirt.
STOP defending her. SHE IS DISGUSTING!!!

Comment by Glenn
2007-11-23 10:39:51

EXACTLY!

 
 
Comment by Marc
2007-11-23 09:15:20

This site never fails. You can stop coming to this and visit and frequent much better, higher quality sites, and out of sheer curiosity, visit this site, and find the same bullshit. Carolina and that travesty, who’s name I no longer even care to try to remember, still run the same lame site. Too bad for you two that there will always be better sites to go to than this one. Oh well…shit serves shit.

Comment by c
2007-11-23 12:01:28

Ha! Exactly! And the part that kills me is that my stupid curiosity contributes to keeping this site going, cause lets face it it doesn’t matter how many people think this site is complete shit, we’re still contributing to their hits. Arrrrgghhh!

Comment by fsajkfdldfh
2007-11-24 07:14:46

LMAO.

True Britney fantards right here.

Marc and C! You are very wack.

 
 
Comment by Glenn
2007-11-23 16:52:05

don’t let the door hit you on the way out. I LOVE this.

 
 
Comment by You want it!
2007-11-23 10:22:37

Wow for someone who is always so disgusted by Britney you SURE do spend a LOT of time up in her business. . . . I think these pictures must really get you off, or you would post others equally fairly. The real issue here is that you are wishing you had more access.

Comment by fsajkfdldfh
2007-11-24 07:19:13

“You want it!” is a fantard. There are waaaaaay too many fantards in here.

 
 
Comment by Glenn
2007-11-23 10:37:35

More access to this nastiness? What a load of rubbish you fantards try to pull. The bitch is nasty and you know it.

 
Comment by Nasty girl
2007-11-23 11:43:35

she is so digusting. chloride canot clean this digusting pig. Her kids will be embrass to know what a slut they has as a mom.

 
Comment by Adam
2007-11-23 12:19:15

Lmao Carolina is so sad… #chuckle#

Comment by Glenn
2007-11-23 16:55:29

What is sad is that you continuously defend someone that you don’t even know…just because she has a record. If you saw the same person on the street, you would judge her just as we are. That makes you the sad person and, trust me, we laugh at your type all the time. chuckle that fantard.

Comment by Adam
2007-11-24 05:33:12

No i wouldn’t because i wouldn’t see what the camera sees idiot. My eyes don’t have zoom technology. Plus i walk up right and am taller than 3 feet, and don’t go round perving up womens skirts, so no i wouldn’t judge. I don’t really judge people on their appearance to be honest. Unless they are EXTREMELY obese i just think why? why…? lol i did chuckle.

 
Comment by mon Subscribed to comments via email
2007-11-24 10:35:11

defending someone u dont know is as sad as judging them, dont u think? and if i saw ‘the same person on the street’ i wudnt think she is a whore, or a bad mom, or a crazy person, only a girl who is different from the rest, who doesnt care about what other ppl may think and who, probably, has quite more problems than we get to think.

 
 
Comment by fsajkfdldfh
2007-11-24 07:25:50

And Britney is not sad?

LMAO, why must you dumbass fantards be such f*cking dumbasses?

 
 
Comment by Exyank
2007-11-23 14:17:53

At least she’s got the beaver covered. Too bad she’s not covering her ass, but this is Britney, you can’t expect too much.

 
Comment by The Joker
2007-11-23 14:20:34

At least she seems to have found some underwear somewhere. Maybe they were selling some at Starbucks?

 
Comment by Amanda
2007-11-23 18:14:53

Nasty, as usual. She needs a flea dip, a less busted weave, and a stylist. I think I can actually smell her through my monitor.

 
Comment by Music Fan
2007-11-23 19:05:29

I don’t agree with a lot that Britney does but I really have a problem with photographers/paparazzi aiming their cameras at a female crotch.

Comment by Exyank
2007-11-24 01:47:24

If Britney weren’t notorious for making her private parts public, the paparazzi almost certainly wouldn’t be as likely to be pointing their lenses there.

 
 
Comment by alcaatras
2007-11-23 23:53:14

so its unacceptabel for celebs tp have hair on their body. legs. crotch. or pimples on their faces? and who is it who is commenting here? NOT ANNA WINTOUR. its u and me, and us - the public, and then we scream that the media puts un-fair pressure on ordinary ppl by their portrayal of bodies… lol. and besides if there were images of he legs all waxed and all. u wud say, ‘oh she had time to get her legs waxed, but not enough to do t his and that and this”. im gald u posted his CAR. at least now we know its not the media that makes us feel horrible about the way we look. but ordinary ppl themselves.

Comment by shortirox
2007-11-24 05:36:01

You’ll never hear me call her fat or ugly. What gets me is her overall lack of hygiene. These pictures acualy aren’t that bad. It’s just that on a normal basis she goes out looking down right dirty. I am a normal woman I work full time and I take care of my daughter everyday without a court moniter babysitting me. I still have time to look neat, tidy, clothes matching, and at least like I give a f*$k. My pajamas match better then her clothes going out for the night. She is disgusting period.

 
 
Comment by Missy
2007-11-24 04:36:57

She is 26 not 16, she should dress appropriately. She is in no was fat, but the clothes she wears look a couple of sizes too small. I’m sure she thinks she looks good because in her mind she still sees herself as a beautiful 17 year old that had respect and love of millions of fans. She needs a serious reality check. If she’s going to dress like this then what happens, happens. She finely has enough sense to cover that nasty weave with a headband. Now work on covering the rest of her nastiness.

Comment by Adam
2007-11-24 05:36:48

So if she were 16 she could dress like this?

Comment by Missy
2007-11-24 06:06:53

She’s Britney, she can do what ever she wants. She did dress like this at 16.

Comment by Adam
2007-11-25 02:56:59

No, she really didn’t dress like this at 16. We have not got many pics of her at 16 anyway, she was 17 when everything blew up.

Comment by Missy
2007-11-25 05:34:27

I’m sure you do have many pictures of her Adam. I don’t collect them but there are pictures out there of her dressed raunchy from before she and Kevin hooked up. Her appearance has become plain and simple trash since she has been left to her own divises. That’s what happens when you fire your stylist, manager and everyone that had anything to do with marketing Britney. What you see now is the real Britney. Trash.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
 
Comment by montana mike
2007-11-24 18:20:51

if you don’t want someone taking pictures of that nasty hairy ass, then cover it up. when those poor boys grow up, when they look at the family album-this is what they are going to have to look at. she has no respect for herself at all.

 
2007-11-24 18:28:05

walzen geldspielautomat freeware

good article

 
Comment by ...
2007-11-24 20:13:28

as much as i hate her, i have to say that the front scars on her legs have been there for yrs, they were from when she had a knee surgery back in the day, when she broke her leg rehearsing, as for the back one that seems to be a new one, also i can’t believe hairs grow back there, that’s pretty gross, that is highly uncommon unless she is half beast.

 
Comment by ...
2007-11-24 20:15:41

also someone needs to tell her those tops are suppost to go with jeans or leggins, someone pls throw this bitch a vogue, she is so fucking clueless

Comment by Missy
2007-11-25 05:37:06

And I thought I was the only one who thought that. Thank You.

 
 
Comment by Adam
2007-11-25 03:01:10

I see no har lol…but then again i guess i’m just deluded right? Some people would believe it if it was reported that Britney was really Zach Braff in disguse lmao.

 
Comment by br
2007-11-27 07:28:20

Maybe shes waiting to wax!

 
Comment by KayCee
2007-11-29 16:38:41

I see no hair. I do see spider veins that could be mistaken for hair. I also really don’t need to see the bottom of her ass hanging out like usual.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

most favorite videos:

advertisement:


photos galore:




Movie I Recommend


Girl, Interrupted

One of my favorite movies of all time.

On my Playlist


Katy Perry - One of the Boys

Best pop album I've heard in a while.

Celebrity Comments For MySpace

spankin' new

Partners

Heart Beats


We Burn Feeds

cross-platform browsing


ToB is smart. Try us on the Nintendo Wii or on your current PDA cell phone. Watch how the layout seamlessly changes to fit any platform that you surf in from ! How cool is that? Check out our news while you're on the go or while you take a break from Mario Bros. !

Get The Fox


ToB is a Web 2.0 experience. We suggest that you download the latest version of Firefox since we want you to view this site the way it was intended to.

Server Management



About Us | Advertise with Us | Terms of Service | Investor Relations | Wireless | Privacy Policy
© Hollywood.com, Inc. NASDAQ:HOLL
This Blog is not controlled, reviewed or endorsed by Hollywood.com