Continuing To Build The Britney Spears Brand

brit_ok.jpg
brit_ok01.jpgbrit_ok2.jpgbrit_ok3.jpg

Three pictures from the Ok! Magazine photoshoot where Britney Spears supposedly had a “complete and total meltdown during the interview” have leaked. Granted, the pictures that were chosen were probably the only ones that came out respectably normal since Ok! probably didn’t wanna deal with a lawsuit. The overly photoshoped photos look great, but that ain’t Brit Brit. Now if only the girl in the pictures wasn’t the Starbucks going, rat weave wearing, pantiless, greasy fast food momma we see everyday! Wouldn’t that be somethin’!

Want Britney to give you more? Click here.


Related Posts:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

31 Comments »

Comment by kim
2007-11-06 01:24:59

talkin’ about glamour!…are these the pictures that OK! Mag said if published could possibly “ruin her career.”???…pretty odd…

Comment by Agent D
2007-11-06 09:09:15

Yeah, these are damning phots, just photoshopped like crazy. I don’t think OK! was telling the truth, I don’t think they ever really do.

Comment by Agent D
2007-11-06 09:17:21

*Aren’t*, sorry, can’t type today.

 
 
 
Comment by alcaatras
2007-11-06 01:29:37

what about it so? dont u realise U help build the britney brand as much with your hate and shiteous comments? lol eat it lol

 
Comment by Emma
2007-11-06 01:43:13

Why these negative comments about some really good pictures of Britney?

Why do you ALWAYS need to turn the positive stuff into something negative? I simply don’t get it :s

Comment by Kate
2007-11-06 07:04:22

Exactly what is so negative about acknowledging that these photos “look great” (though heavily photoshopped) and wishing that the real Britney we see in photos every day was back to looking this good in real life? Heck, I wish she was back to looking good, taking better care of herself and her kids. The sad fact is that, hit album or not, she ISN’T, and she’s showing no signs of improving anytime soon. Why continue to pretend otherwise? Can you imagine what her sales would be if she cleaned herself up, quit partying, rediscovered her work ethic, and started demonstrably giving a damn about her kids a la Jennifer Garner and other celebrity moms (’sorry, but dragging them around in toy cars and real cars doesn’t qualify)? There’s no denying that with the version of herself she keeps putting in the public eye, she’s become her own worst enemy.

Comment by carrie
2007-11-06 08:51:34

Kate, Do you believe that stuff OK was saying about her and how she acted during this photoshoot? Do you believe she wiped chicken grease on this dress….the one they state she is pictured in? Do you believe that she ran to the restroom like 10 times to do who knows what? Do you believe that she let her dog crap on one of the dresses? The person in that photo does not appear to me to have been like that….I thought they were completely lying about that interview….but based on how she has been acting…I really don’t know. Tell me what you think about that OK interview where these pics come from……

Comment by Kate
2007-11-06 13:35:22

Honestly, based on what I’ve seen and heard about her through a wide variety of media outlets over the past year, I’d have to say yes. I do believe Brit is capable of the behavior described at the OK shoot (and I wish I didn’t - as I said in past posts, I was really rooting for her after the divorce). If she wiped grease on the dress, she probably did so after these photos were taken. Re: the dog, I ABSOLUTELY believe that one. Brit keeps showing in public that she can’t/won’t discipline herself, so reports that she doesn’t discipline/control her dog or her children are not surprising. That’s the thing about these photo shoots/artificially polished images - they create an icon of a person that doesn’t exist in real life. The Brit in the photos is the Brit we’d like to see and believe in, but unfortunately it’s nothing like the Brit we are presented with on a daily basis in more candid, public environments, when she’s choosing her own wardrobe and makeup and “being herself.” None of us know what she’s like in private. We only have her public behavior on which to base our praise or criticisms. From that perspective, Brit has done pretty much nothing to merit praise within the past few years. Whatever is currently positive in her life is largely the result of other people’s efforts. Her lousy VMA performance and refusal to work to promote her latest album reinforce this impression (like I said earlier, can you imagine how this album would burn up the charts if her image was clean and she was capable of performing at the top of her game? It’s #1 now, but I don’t think her sales are anywhere near what they COULD be if she cleaned up her act). It’s been a long, tragic fall from the beautiful pop princess she once was. I frankly believe that we may be seeing the “real Brit” for the first time. She’s gotten rid of all the people who used to be close to her, who looked out for her image and helped her create/maintain it, who made key business decisions for her in those early years of her career. Without that support network and left to her own questionable devices…well, the magic has gone, and almost every choice she makes leads her to sink even lower. There’s no denying that she’s alienated a LOT of fans (or folks who WOULD be fans if they didn’t keep seeing her in such unflattering public spectacles). She’s Cinderella in reverse, and it’s a real bummer.

 
 
 
Comment by Agent D
2007-11-06 08:52:53

Emma, I see your point. These aren’t damning photos! She looks good, but like I said before, the person who photoshopped the pics deserves an award.

Comment by Agent D
2007-11-06 09:08:10

Yeah, I meant to reply to Kim, but Emma, I still see your point.

 
Comment by Laura
2007-11-06 15:29:59

What celebrity photos are not photo shopped? It’s not like she looks like a completley different person a la Mariah.

Comment by Agent D
2007-11-07 09:40:37

Ok, yes she does! That first pic DOES NOT LOOK LIKE BRITNEY! AT ALL. I had to stare at it to figure out who it was.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Exyank
2007-11-06 02:14:03

I don’t understand. Photoshopped images of Britney Spears. So what?

 
Comment by Michael
2007-11-06 04:14:35

You mean the britney that you put on your website everyday for no good reason, that if we want to come to this site we have to see…then yeah.

 
Comment by paulo
2007-11-06 04:42:14

oh come on, maybe they dont really have those pics that will hurt her career. cause if they do, im sure they will publish them because they’re all hungry for money. carolina, dont ever write or publish something you’re not even sure of.

 
Comment by asley
2007-11-06 06:28:59

stop hating on her…..get a life ruben

Comment by Baby Jane Rocks
2007-11-06 14:48:07

Actually Carolina posted this.

 
 
Comment by carolina_is_a_skank
2007-11-06 07:44:17

Why dont you just stop posting Britney stuff on here. You sound ridiculious with your hateful comments about not just britney but a lot of beautiful female celebrities you like to bash because their either “wearing too much make up” “too thin” or “too fat”. Bottom line is Britney is a beautiful girl and you would be lucky to be half as beautiful as her. Why dont you post some pics of your self at your worst moments and we will let you know how nasty you look.

Comment by Kate
2007-11-06 17:03:06

Honestly, Britney USED TO be beautiful. She could be beautiful again if she took better care of herself and was willing to accept honest assessments re: her makeup and fashion choices. To say that she currently looks “beautiful” with a perpetually ratty, greasy weave, a frequently bloated, blotchy complexion, artificially plumped lips, enormous sunglasses, boots that are so overworn they probably smell like a sheep dip, and clothing that’s frequently see-through and at least three sizes too small…well, I gotta tell ya, NOBODY with those stats is gonna look “beautiful.” We all know what Britney’s external beauty potential is - that’s why watching her in her current state is so very aggravating. Until she decides that what she’s currently doing isn’t working (and it’s taking her a darned long time to get a clue), she’s not going to come across as “beautiful” in public. Hence all the countless blog/media jokes at her expense.

Comment by Kate
2007-11-07 18:11:56

Britney is still beautiful, sadly the stress of the past year has taken its toll on her. She just needs to get out of the spotlight for a while and rest and relax and just take better care of herself. And who the hell is this other KATE posting.. Find a new name honey like Ms. Spears herself there can only be one!!

Comment by Baby Jane Rocks
2007-11-07 18:27:52

There’s 2 of you? *cries* One’s enough!!

 
 
 
 
Comment by Agent D
2007-11-06 08:48:16

It doesn’t even look like her in the first pic! Whoever photoshopped these pics deserves an award!

 
Comment by lalo
2007-11-06 09:09:30

This pics look like a mix between a very manly Ashlee Simpson and brit

 
Comment by Baby Jane Rocks
2007-11-06 11:20:19

Talk about OTT photoshopping! It must of taken an army to make her look that good!

 
Comment by Jelly
2007-11-06 11:27:31

This is what Britney would look like if she got glammed up everytime she went out of the house. All celebs photoshop, so i don’t see what the uproar is about. I like the one in the brown dress but the other two i don’t like.

Comment by Janelle
2007-11-07 01:53:29

Britney will NEVER look like these photos because she has 2 children and her body has changed. Go to breatheheavy and fantasize over all the old photos they have posted there because she doesn’t look like that anymore in real life and never will. How could Brit ever tour when her fans all refuse to accept her as she really is? In fact, her clothing choices suggest that she hasn’t accepted reality yet either.

Comment by Kate
2007-11-07 18:14:47

That’s not true when she’s all done up she looks like her FABulous self as usual, we just aren’t used to seeing her in her everyday life, we’re use to seeing her work the red carpet and looking sexy in her videos!!

 
 
 
Comment by Baby Jane Rocks
2007-11-06 18:27:16

Britney’s new album will offically be classed as #2 because billboard have changed their policy there Eagles are #1!! YES!!!!!!!!!

http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003668840

 
2007-11-20 21:22:25

geldspielautomaten austricksen

good article

 
2007-11-24 15:37:42

geldspielautomat software

good article

 
Comment by tommycampbell
2007-12-16 08:53:52

due to the mess she’s in, I guess she’s taking her own brand down instead of building it!

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

most favorite videos:

advertisement:


photos galore:




Movie I Recommend


Girl, Interrupted

One of my favorite movies of all time.

On my Playlist


Katy Perry - One of the Boys

Best pop album I've heard in a while.

Celebrity Comments For MySpace

spankin' new

Partners

Heart Beats


We Burn Feeds

cross-platform browsing


ToB is smart. Try us on the Nintendo Wii or on your current PDA cell phone. Watch how the layout seamlessly changes to fit any platform that you surf in from ! How cool is that? Check out our news while you're on the go or while you take a break from Mario Bros. !

Get The Fox


ToB is a Web 2.0 experience. We suggest that you download the latest version of Firefox since we want you to view this site the way it was intended to.

Server Management



About Us | Advertise with Us | Terms of Service | Investor Relations | Wireless | Privacy Policy
© Hollywood.com, Inc. NASDAQ:HOLL
This Blog is not controlled, reviewed or endorsed by Hollywood.com