<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liv Tyler Is Very Irresistable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tob.hollywood.com/2007/11/01/liv-tyler-is-very-irresistable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tob.hollywood.com/2007/11/01/liv-tyler-is-very-irresistable/</link>
	<description>Same Crap, Different Smell</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 04:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gi</title>
		<link>http://tob.hollywood.com/2007/11/01/liv-tyler-is-very-irresistable/#comment-35907</link>
		<dc:creator>Gi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 05:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tob.hollywood.com/2007/11/01/liv-tyler-is-very-irresistable/#comment-35907</guid>
		<description>Is Liv pregnant again??? Looks like it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Liv pregnant again??? Looks like it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exyank</title>
		<link>http://tob.hollywood.com/2007/11/01/liv-tyler-is-very-irresistable/#comment-35874</link>
		<dc:creator>Exyank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 00:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tob.hollywood.com/2007/11/01/liv-tyler-is-very-irresistable/#comment-35874</guid>
		<description>Okay, it's a sort of "re-launch". It's a new/fresh ad campaign for the original perfume (which, by the way, is a very nice rose floral with a hint of anise in the heartnotes). Not sure what's up with the bottle she's holding, as it looks much darker than the original. Perhaps it's just the lights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, it&#8217;s a sort of &#8220;re-launch&#8221;. It&#8217;s a new/fresh ad campaign for the original perfume (which, by the way, is a very nice rose floral with a hint of anise in the heartnotes). Not sure what&#8217;s up with the bottle she&#8217;s holding, as it looks much darker than the original. Perhaps it&#8217;s just the lights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katielynn</title>
		<link>http://tob.hollywood.com/2007/11/01/liv-tyler-is-very-irresistable/#comment-35765</link>
		<dc:creator>katielynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 14:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tob.hollywood.com/2007/11/01/liv-tyler-is-very-irresistable/#comment-35765</guid>
		<description>Irresistible is spelled with I-B-L-E at the end.  just a little FYI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Irresistible is spelled with I-B-L-E at the end.  just a little FYI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exyank</title>
		<link>http://tob.hollywood.com/2007/11/01/liv-tyler-is-very-irresistable/#comment-35711</link>
		<dc:creator>Exyank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 03:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tob.hollywood.com/2007/11/01/liv-tyler-is-very-irresistable/#comment-35711</guid>
		<description>Givenchy's "Very Irresistible" was launched back in 2003, and Liv has always been the "face" of the fragrance. However, the bottle she's holding in these shots looks a bit different (different colouring), and I'm guessing this is some new variation on the original, possibly a limited edition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Givenchy&#8217;s &#8220;Very Irresistible&#8221; was launched back in 2003, and Liv has always been the &#8220;face&#8221; of the fragrance. However, the bottle she&#8217;s holding in these shots looks a bit different (different colouring), and I&#8217;m guessing this is some new variation on the original, possibly a limited edition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.534 seconds -->
