Comments on: Exclusive: Beckhams Booed and Insulted Last Night in Beverly Hills

By: MikeG

MikeG — Sat, 28 Jul 2007 03:56:15 +0000

tougher than what, badmitten?

By: MikeG

MikeG — Sat, 28 Jul 2007 02:15:23 +0000

Hey, if David wanted to kill some paparazzi he should have had Posh put her super-boobs out the window as they drove off….SHE COULD PUT AN EYE OUT WITH THOSE THINGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

By: MikeG

MikeG — Sat, 28 Jul 2007 02:13:42 +0000

simple…..ITS CALLED SUPPLY AND DEMAND

By: MP

MP — Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:33:45 +0000

It seems like now celebrities have an obligation to put their private lives available to paparazzis (in the end, to us, magazine/blogs/news readers) It is unfortunate that there are no regulations to control this kind of behavour, which I find offensive. I wonder: How would paparazzis feel like if suddenly celebrities hire salkers to follow every single move they make? Not so funny when the joke is on you, huh…But sadly, in the end they take the pictures because there are people who like to see them, so the media pays them money for these pictures so they can get higher ratings/circulation by publish them. So…there is something for us to think about too. What would happen if suddenly there was no demand for these type of pics? Would it make a difference? I think so. But unfortunately, it is just wishful thinking.

By: Bert

Bert — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:23:18 +0000

Perhaps in part because the paparazzi aren’t really the problem here; the real problem is all the bedazzled sheeple and kool-aid drinkers who buy the magazines and tabloids or watch the TV shows that are fueled by this material.Yes, the photogs are often rude or out of control, but they’re also just a symptom of a celebrity-drunk cultural smokescreen that is itself sick and devoid of any purpose beyond keeping the masses enslaved.If we could get ourselves to stop buying the magazines and stop watching the televised crap, this would all simmer down or even go away. There might be more real news on TV then, and the Beckhams could eat in peace.

By: Amanda

Amanda — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:04:53 +0000

I completely agree.

By: Amanda

Amanda — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:03:53 +0000

That doesn’t mean they should have to put up with being stalked 24/7 no matter what they do. There’s a time and a place for photo ops.

By: Amanda

Amanda — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:03:07 +0000

She never implied that it was American paparazzi that killed Diana. I think she’s right… until something like that happens on American soil, nothing’s going to be done.

By: Agent D

Agent D — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 18:23:23 +0000

I saw a show on tv about the paps, and anyone with a camera can do this “job”. Shouldn’t they have press passes, and be legal, so accidents and stalking doesn’t happen? I think the Govenator, good old Arnold, should do something about them. How is it fait that all David and Victoria wanted was to go to dinner, in peace. But instead, they are harrased and called names because the physco paps can’t get their picture. Such bull shit.

By: Agent D

Agent D — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 18:20:30 +0000

Well said. I was going to say the same thing!