Jennifer Aniston seems to be the victim of a magazine cover manipulated to twist the truth. In the original picture, she was carrying an art catalog and a pair of sunglasses. In the Star Magazine photoshoped cover, she is clearly not. How far can AND will these magazines go to sell a story? Scary, huh?
Every single picture you see in a book or magazine anywhere in the world goes through some retouching before it is printed.
This cover is an example of a lot of retouching.
You might have seen pictures of beaches or models that don’t even exist in real life.
It’s not scary (this probably will be for Jennifer). Selling is something we just gotta do lol.
I know many photos are manipulated, and if it’s to sell a product like perfume, so what. However, if it is trying to sell a lie about a person that is just wrong! In Ads the subject knows the photo will be manipulated and they know most often what the end product will be. The end product of selling lies is hurt people, and sometimes reputations ruined. It is disgusting that Star would do that. But what dictates what is shown in this publication is obviously not the morality of the person in charge, but rather their pocketbook, unexpected, no, sad, yes.
this posting is really NO GOOD> i mean clearly they needed a neater picture so they deleted the sunglasses and the CATALOGUE. otehrwise ruben would have posted the following 2 minths later - Jen is now an art house cpokesperson after she pictured with their catalogue. but really these guys did it for a neater picture. thats all. probably she is really doing the story - and that would NOT have needed any pic
what the hell are you talking about? Your comment makes no sense!
Star has done it before. They took a photo of Maddox Jolie that had his eyes closed, so the actually added eyeballs to the photo to make it a better cover shot. Shameful!
Nude Pam Anderson Nude Preteen Nudists
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view